some similarities between the new Haddādiyyah and the Rawāfidh

الإمام ربيع المدخلي -الله يحفظه-
"من أوجه الشبه بين الحدادية الجديدة و الروافض
:الرفض؛فالروافض رفضوا زيد بن علي لَمَّا تولَّى أبابكر و عمر،و الْحَدادية رفضوا أصول أهل السنة فِي الْجَرح و التعديل و تنقصوا أئمة الْجَرح و التعديل و تنقصوا أصولَهم.
:إسقاطهم لعلماء السنة الْمُعاصرين و تنقصهم لَهم ورد أحكامهم القائمة على الأدلة و البراهين، وخروجهم عليهم و طعنهم فِيهم و فِي مناهجهم و أصولِهم القائمة على الكتاب و السنة و منهج السلف الصالِح.
:تسترهم ببعض علماء السنة مكرًا و كيدًا مع بغضهم لَهم و مُخالفتهم لَهم فِي منهجهم و أصولِهم و بغضهم لأكثرهم.
لِمَاذا يفعلون هذا؟
الْجَواب:ليتمكنوا من إسقاط من يُحاربونَهم من أهل السنة و ليتمكنوا من الطعن فِيهم و تشويههم و تشويه أصولِهم؛و ليحققوا أهدافهم فِي تشتيت أهل الْمَنهج السلفِي و ضرب بعضهم ببعض.
:الدعوة إلَى التقليد كما هو حال الروافض و غلاة الصوفية.
(المجموع ج ٩ ص٤١٥-٤١٦)
Al-Imām Rabee' Ibn Hādī Al-Madkhalī said:
Some of the similar points between the new Haddādiyyah and the Rawāfidh:
1.The Rawāfidh rejected Zayd Ibn 'Ali when he accepted Abu Bakr and Umar,and the Haddādiyah rejected the foundations of Ahlul-Sunnah in disparagement and praise(Al-Jarh wat Ta'deel) they also belittled the Imāms of disparagement and praise and belittled their foundations.
2.Their elimination of the present day Scholars of Ahlul-Sunnah and their belittlement of them rejecting their rulings that are based upon Proofs and evidences, opposing them while slandering them,their methodologies and their foundations that are based upon the Qurān, Sunnah and the methodology of the Salaf As-Sālih.
3.Deceptively and deceitfully Hiding behind some of the Scholars of the Sunnah while having hatred for them and while opposing the methodology and foundations of those scholars and while also having hatred for most of them.
Why do they do this ?
The answer:so they can be able to drop those who they attack from Ahlul-Sunnah and so they can defame them and distort their images and foundations, and also so they can achieve their goal of dividing the people of the Manhaj As-Salafī so that they attack each other.
4.The call to Taqleed similar to the condition of the Rawāfidh and extreme Sūfis.
Source:(Majmoo' vol 9 pg.415-416)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

as-Shaykh al-Imām Rabee's advice to those who rely on commendations and their actions do not testify for them that they are Salafī.

as-Shaykh Rabee’ was asked: "Some of the callers are not known for Salafiyyah and they were warned against, but there are still those who sit with them with the argument that they were not disparaged with a detailed disparagement, and they were commended by as-Shaykh al-‘Abbād and other than him. So brothers have been divided between critic and praiser because of those callers. So what is your statement to them?" Answer: "I say it is obligatory upon the one who the people have differed concerning him and who does not commend himself by openly manifesting the Salafī  methodology, but he relies on the commendation of this one and that one...This one and that one are not infallible with their commendations, they could give a commendation based on the apparent condition of an individual and that apparent condition could flatter them and he could pretend that he is upon Salafiyyah and that he is upon the correct methodology, and he hides the opposite of what he makes ap
Read more

Giving precedence to the elders is not general

Giving precedence to the elders is not general Ibn Battāl Rahimahullah said in the explanation of Saheeh Al-Bukhārī vol.9 pg. 317 and 318 in the Maktaba alrushd print Honouring the elders and putting them first in speaking and in all affairs is from the manners and excellent morals of Islām, and Abdur-Razzaq mentioned in the Hadeeth (from glorifying Allāh's loftiness is respecting those who have reached old age in Islām) and with this meaning the Prophet ﷺ said:(The elder the elder) So he ordered  to let the elder be the first one too speak, so this is a Sunnah, but the Hadeeth of Ibn 'Umar proves that the meaning of this is not general, in fact it is incumbent that the elder starts speaking in that which the young and old are equal in knowledge, but if the youth knew that which the elder was ignorant of, then it is incumbent for the one who has knowledge to mention it and put it forth, even if he was young, and that is not considered bad manners or being short with the rig
Read more

It is not a condition that warnings and refutations come from scholars

Imām Rabee b. Hādī al-Madkhalī stated: I would be nice that a refutation would be from an 'Ālim firmly grounded in knowledge with the descriptions that you mentioned, but it is not an obligation on every refuter to fulfill these discriptions, and it is not obligatory to complete these discriptions in every refutation, and if we was to make this a condition for every refuter and every refutation corruption would spread and would over come most of the Ummah except for some exceptions of the people. And what emphasizes the inaccuracy of the refuter having to fulfill these conditions is that you will not find in most Muslim lands firmly grounded Salafi Ulama, but you will find in those lands students of knowledge, and with that Allāh aided them in the spread of Tawheed and refuting polythiesms and innovations and superstitions. And i ask Doctor Ibraheem if there was a country or countries in which innovations and evil was being spread, and there was not found in that countr
Read more