Criticisms of the Shaykh of al'Azhar Masjid Ahmed At'tayyib

Al-'Allāmah Rabee' Ibn Hādī Al-Madkhalī حفظه الله said in one of his refutations of the "Shaykh" of Al-Azhar, Ahmed At-tayyib :
"Where are you (Ahmed At-tayyib) regarding the repulsivness of as-Shirk and Al-Mushrikeen, and an example of their repulsivness is Allāh the most High's statement :
'Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islām, the Quran and Prophet Muhammad ﷺ) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and al-Mushrikeen will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.'
Therefore Allāh ruled that they will be in the Fire of Hell forever and He described them as the worst creatures.
And you (Ahmed At'tayyib) praise Buddha the heretic (Mulhid) and describe him as having sound insight and you describe his belief of heresy (Ilhād)that it is a religion of mercy and that it is  unexceeded !!!.
Doctor Muhammad Dhaya' ar'Rahmān al A'dhami who is of Indian origin said in his book "Conclusions of the Religions of India" (page 141) during his speech  about Buddha and his faith (i.e, Buddhism), "And they have also mentioned: that the earlier scholars are unanimous that Buddha used to deny al ulūhiyyah..."
And as for his  followers then they worship him (i.e, Buddha) and their belief regarding him is that he is a perfect god.....
The spread of Buddhism:
Buddhism was never restricted to the upper class of the Indian society, in fact it's doors were open for everyone who wanted to enter into it, unlike the Hindu faith. So Buddhism spread massively and a group of the Hindus from the lower class, and king (Ashoka) embraced  the Buddhist faith and made it the country's official religion, and he sent callers and missionaries inside and out side of India, and he sent his son (Mahinda) to south India and Sri Lanka and Buddhism reached east and central Asia and in that time there wasn't any major differing between the Buddhist and Brahmanist.
O Shaykh of Al'Jāmi' Al'Azhar this is Buddha who denies the existence of Allāh, and the one who's followers took him as a deity besides Allāh, so are you going to recant your praise of Buddha, his faith and the faith of his worshippers and announce your recantation openly?"

From the article, "Criticisms of the Shaykh of  al-Azhar Masjid  Ahmed At-tayyib (the third study)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

as-Shaykh al-Imām Rabee's advice to those who rely on commendations and their actions do not testify for them that they are Salafī.

as-Shaykh Rabee’ was asked: "Some of the callers are not known for Salafiyyah and they were warned against, but there are still those who sit with them with the argument that they were not disparaged with a detailed disparagement, and they were commended by as-Shaykh al-‘Abbād and other than him. So brothers have been divided between critic and praiser because of those callers. So what is your statement to them?" Answer: "I say it is obligatory upon the one who the people have differed concerning him and who does not commend himself by openly manifesting the Salafī  methodology, but he relies on the commendation of this one and that one...This one and that one are not infallible with their commendations, they could give a commendation based on the apparent condition of an individual and that apparent condition could flatter them and he could pretend that he is upon Salafiyyah and that he is upon the correct methodology, and he hides the opposite of what he makes ap...
Read more

Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Hādī Al-Madkhalī explains the evil results of bad companionship

Al-Allāmah Muhammad ibn Hādī Al-Madkhalī حفظه الله تعالى said: "Sufyaan ibn Wakee' ibn Al-Jarrah ibn Maleeh Ar-Ruāsī was afflicted by his warraq, which means his writer, because his writer used to write down hadeeths that was not his. The people advised him about his writer several times, but he did not accept their advice, so he fell, and using him (i.e., his hadeeth) as proof was rejected. And this is a proof of evil companionship and that his company could affect you O person being accompanied, even if you are not doing what he does, and this is also a sign for us in this time, they say so and so is from the students of the Mashayakh the student of so and so, ok if he was evil how does that help so and so? It doesn't help him in anyway, Sufyaan ibn Wakee' was harmed because of his writer he was advised he was told his writer was evil, he puts hadeeths with your hadeeths that's not your hadeeths, but he refused to accept the advice so they abandoned him. Read h...
Read more

Giving precedence to the elders is not general

Giving precedence to the elders is not general Ibn Battāl Rahimahullah said in the explanation of Saheeh Al-Bukhārī vol.9 pg. 317 and 318 in the Maktaba alrushd print Honouring the elders and putting them first in speaking and in all affairs is from the manners and excellent morals of Islām, and Abdur-Razzaq mentioned in the Hadeeth (from glorifying Allāh's loftiness is respecting those who have reached old age in Islām) and with this meaning the Prophet ﷺ said:(The elder the elder) So he ordered  to let the elder be the first one too speak, so this is a Sunnah, but the Hadeeth of Ibn 'Umar proves that the meaning of this is not general, in fact it is incumbent that the elder starts speaking in that which the young and old are equal in knowledge, but if the youth knew that which the elder was ignorant of, then it is incumbent for the one who has knowledge to mention it and put it forth, even if he was young, and that is not considered bad manners or being short with the ri...
Read more